AI Acceleration Impact
Project Duration (with AI)
Without AI
27d
With AI
20d
Saved
7d
Engineering Effort
Without AI
499h
With AI
336h
Saved
163h
Shared Plan · Read-only view. Sign in to move this plan to your workspace.
This project is a Git-first, security-first Kubernetes control plane designed for Platform Engineers, SREs, and Engineering Managers using Kubernetes on cloud platforms like AWS, GCP, or Azure. It addresses the challenges of environment drift, risky workload promotions, and unpredictable cloud costs by providing a preview of changes and their cost implications before production deployment. A lightweight read-only Kubernetes agent ensures security and compliance, while all promotion actions are auditable through Git. The integration of a cost engine and LLM explanation engine adds complexity to the solution, ensuring that risks and costs are clearly communicated.
Project Duration (with AI)
Without AI
27d
With AI
20d
Saved
7d
Engineering Effort
Without AI
499h
With AI
336h
Saved
163h
8
days (longest dependency chain)
Project duration: 20d · 2 sprints estimated
180
tasks
52 stories · 5 phases
Stories broken into tasks for execution
Foundation Setup
Establish the foundational infrastructure and development environment.
Core Development
Develop core functionalities and integrate essential components.
Security and Compliance
Implement security features and ensure compliance with standards.
Advanced Integrations
Integrate advanced features and optimize system performance.
User Experience and Finalization
Enhance user experience and finalize the product for launch.
Establish the foundational infrastructure and development environment.
Develop core functionalities and integrate essential components.
Implement security features and ensure compliance with standards.
Integrate advanced features and optimize system performance.
Enhance user experience and finalize the product for launch.
This product addresses three critical, compounding problems faced by modern platform teams operating Kubernetes at scale: (1) environment drift between staging and production, leading to unpredictable production behavior; (2) risky workload promotions with no clear preview of operational or cost impact, resulting in outages or unexpected spend; and (3) cloud cost spikes following deployments, which are often only detected after the fact. The significance of these issues is high—environment drift and risky promotions are leading causes of production incidents, and cost overruns are a top concern for organizations with large cloud footprints. The primary audience experiencing these pain points are Platform Engineers, SREs, and Engineering Managers at mid-to-large enterprises running Kubernetes on AWS, GCP, or Azure. Current workarounds include using GitOps tools (e.g., ArgoCD, Flux) for deployments, siloed cost dashboards (e.g., CloudHealth, Cloudability), and manual pre-deployment reviews, but these are fragmented and do not provide an integrated, actionable preview of both operational and financial impact.
The solution is a Git-first, security-first Kubernetes control plane that integrates deployment intent, operational change preview, and cost impact analysis into a single workflow. It uses a lightweight, read-only agent per cluster (installed via Helm) to gather state, ensuring no direct mutation of clusters. All promotions are orchestrated through Git, providing full auditability and change traceability. A key innovation is the LLM-powered explanation engine, which surfaces plain-English risk and cost reasoning for each promotion. The hybrid delivery model (SaaS control plane + per-cluster agent) enables centralized management with enterprise-grade security. Compared to existing solutions, this approach uniquely connects deployment intent, operational change, and cost in a single, auditable workflow, with strict security boundaries and SOC2 compliance as non-negotiable features.
This product delivers integrated, actionable previews of both operational and cost impact before Kubernetes workload promotions, reducing production incidents, eliminating environment drift, and preventing cost overruns. Key benefits include: (1) increased deployment confidence with plain-English risk/cost explanations; (2) faster, safer promotions via GitOps workflows; (3) enhanced security and compliance with strict read-only boundaries and audit trails; (4) reduced manual effort and post-deployment firefighting. The unique selling proposition is the combination of Git-first workflow, cost impact preview, and LLM-powered explanations, all delivered with enterprise-grade security and compliance.
Primary users are Platform Engineers, SREs, and Engineering Managers at organizations running Kubernetes on AWS, GCP, or Azure. These users typically work at mid-to-large enterprises (100+ engineers, $1M+ annual cloud spend) with mature DevOps practices and a history of production incidents or cost overruns. The broader market includes companies in regulated industries (finance, healthcare, SaaS) with strong security and compliance requirements. Market size (2026): The global Kubernetes management and DevOps tooling market is estimated at $4.5B+, with strong YoY growth driven by cloud-native adoption. Key segments: enterprise SaaS, regulated industries, cloud-native scale-ups.
Revenue is generated via a subscription-based SaaS model, tiered by number of clusters, managed workloads, and enterprise features (e.g., advanced RBAC, audit, FinOps integrations). Additional revenue streams may include professional services (onboarding, compliance consulting), premium support, and custom integrations. Pricing strategies are typically per-cluster/month or per-seat/month, with enterprise contracts for large-scale deployments. (No explicit validated pricing data provided in the idea text.)
high
mature
Research confidence: high
Research confidence: medium
Threat Level: medium
ArgoCD is an open-source GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes, enabling declarative configuration and automated deployment from Git repositories.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Sources:
FluxCD is an open-source GitOps tool for automating deployment of containerized applications to Kubernetes, with a focus on simplicity and integration with Helm.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Sources:
GitOpsHQ is a commercial GitOps control plane platform that builds on ArgoCD and FluxCD, offering enhanced governance, multi-cluster management, and operational visibility.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Sources:
Cloud providers' managed Kubernetes services offer integrated control planes, cluster management, and basic deployment automation.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Sources:
OpenCost is an open-source tool for real-time cost allocation and monitoring of Kubernetes workloads.
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Sources:
Position as the only Git-first, security-first Kubernetes control plane that previews both operational and financial impact before promotion, with LLM-powered explanations and strict read-only boundaries. Emphasize rapid onboarding, enterprise compliance, and seamless integration with existing GitOps and cloud-native workflows.
feature-1Requirements:
Technical requirements:
feature-2Requirements:
Technical requirements:
feature-3Requirements:
Technical requirements:
feature-4Requirements:
Technical requirements:
feature-5Requirements:
Technical requirements:
feature-6Requirements:
Technical requirements:
feature-7Requirements:
Technical requirements:
Integrations:
feature-8Requirements:
Technical requirements:
integration-1Requirements:
Technical requirements:
Integrations:
infra-1Requirements:
Technical requirements:
nfr-1Requirements:
Technical requirements:
nfr-2Requirements:
Technical requirements:
nfr-3Requirements:
Technical requirements:
nfr-4Requirements:
Technical requirements:
KubeCost Preview is a hybrid-delivered, Git-first, security-first Kubernetes control plane for Platform Engineers, SREs, and Engineering Managers. The system enables previewing workload promotions, cost impact, and risks before production deployment. Its core trust model is a read-only Kubernetes agent (per cluster), SaaS control plane, GitOps orchestration, a cost and billing engine, and an LLM-powered explanation engine, all forming a secure, auditable, and SOC2-compliant architecture.
Major Components:
System Boundaries:
Data Flows:
Integration Points:
flowchart TD
A["Operator UI (React 19)"]
B["API Gateway (Go 1.22, gRPC+REST)"]
C["Auth Service (OIDC)"]
D["Promotion Preview Service"]
E["Cost Engine"]
F["LLM Explanation Engine"]
G["GitOps Orchestrator"]
H["Audit Log Service"]
I["Cluster Management Service"]
J["Helm Management Service"]
K["Billing Reconciliation Service"]
L["Auto-Remediation Service"]
M["DB (PostgreSQL 16)"]
N["Cache (Redis 7.2)"]
O["Per-Cluster Agent (Go, Read-only, Helm 3.15)"]
P["Git Provider"]
Q["Cloud Billing API"]
R["Kubernetes API (Cluster)"]
A-->|HTTPS|B
B-->|JWT/OIDC|C
B-->|Promotion preview|D
D-->|Cost estimate|E
D-->|LLM explanation|F
D-->|GitOps PR|G
B-->|Audit logs|H
B-->|Cluster mgmt|I
B-->|Helm mgmt|J
B-->|FinOps|K
K-->|Billing API|Q
G-->|Git API|P
O-->|Agent sync|I
O-->|Helm data|J
O-->|Cluster state|D
O-->|Secure comms|B
I-->|Cluster metadata|M
J-->|Helm metadata|M
H-->|Audit logs|M
B-->|Cache|N
D-->|DB|M
G-->|DB|M
K-->|DB|M
L-->|Approval workflow|B
L-->|Git PR|P
O-->|Kubernetes API|RSelection Rationale:
Primary Recommendations:
| Category | Primary Recommendation & Version | Rationale & Source |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend Framework | React 19, TypeScript 5 | Enterprise UI, type safety, component ecosystem (React 19 release notes, react.dev) |
| Backend Language/Framework | Go 1.22 (golang.org) | High-performance, secure, cloud-native, ideal for Kubernetes/agent, SOC2 compliance |
| API Layer | gRPC (v1.62), OpenAPI 4 (grpc.io), RESTful endpoints | Efficient internal comms, wide ecosystem, strong schema enforcement |
| Cluster Agent | Go 1.22, Helm 3.15 (helm.sh), Kubernetes API v1.36.1 (kubernetes.io) | Read-only, lightweight, secure |
| GitOps Orchestration | ArgoCD 2.11 (argo-cd.readthedocs.io) | De facto standard, robust GitOps |
| Helm Integration |
Compatibility Considerations:
Primary Pattern:
Supporting Patterns:
Pattern Rationale:
| Feature | Table(s) |
|---|---|
| Kubernetes Workload Promotion Preview | workload_promotions, workload_diffs, promotion_risks, promotion_costs |
| Lightweight Read-Only Kubernetes Agent | clusters, cluster_agents, cluster_snapshots |
| GitOps Orchestration for Promotion Actions | git_repos, git_commits, git_pull_requests, audit_logs |
| LLM Explanation Engine for Promotion Risk and Cost | llm_explanations |
| Cluster Management UI | clusters, cluster_agents |
| Helm Management UI | helm_releases, helm_charts |
| Deep FinOps Billing Reconciliation | billing_accounts, billing_imports, billing_records, cost_attributions |
| Auto-Remediation with Human Approval | remediation_rules, remediation_actions, remediation_approvals, audit_logs |
| Cloud Provider Billing APIs Integration | billing_accounts, billing_imports, billing_records |
| Hybrid Delivery Model Infrastructure | clusters, cluster_agents |
| Security and SOC2 Compliance | audit_logs, users, rbac_roles, rbac_role_bindings |
| NFRs (Performance, Reliability, Time-to-First-Value) | All tables (indexed, partitioned for scale and reliability) |
clusters
cluster_agents
cluster_snapshots
workload_promotions
workload_diffs
promotion_costs
promotion_risks
llm_explanations
git_repos
git_commits
git_pull_requests
helm_charts
helm_releases
billing_accounts
billing_imports
billing_records
cost_attributions
remediation_rules
remediation_actions
remediation_approvals
users
rbac_roles
rbac_role_bindings
audit_logs
erDiagram
clusters ||--o{ cluster_agents : "has"
clusters ||--o{ cluster_snapshots : "has"
clusters ||--o{ workload_promotions : "has"
clusters ||--o{ helm_releases : "has"
clusters ||--o{ cost_attributions : "has"
clusters ||--o{ remediation_rules : "has"
cluster_agents ||--|| clusters : "belongs to"
workload_promotions ||--o{ workload_diffs : "has"
workload_promotions ||--|| promotion_costs : "cost"
workload_promotions ||--|| promotion_risks : "risk"
workload_promotions ||--|| llm_explanations : "explanation"
workload_promotions ||--|| git_commits : "commit"
workload_promotions ||--|| git_pull_requests : "pr"
workload_promotions ||--|| users : "requested by"
helm_releases ||--|| helm_charts : "from"
helm_releases ||--|| clusters : "in"
billing_accounts ||--o{ billing_imports : "has"
billing_accounts ||--o{ billing_records : "has"
billing_records ||--o{ cost_attributions : "maps"
cost_attributions ||--|| clusters : "for"
remediation_rules ||--o{ remediation_actions : "triggers"
remediation_actions ||--|| remediation_approvals : "approval"
remediation_actions ||--|| audit_logs : "logs"
remediation_approvals ||--|| users : "by"
users ||--o{ audit_logs : "performs"
users ||--o{ rbac_role_bindings : "has"
rbac_roles ||--o{ rbac_role_bindings : "bound"All endpoints are under /api/v1/. Future breaking changes will use /api/v2/.
{error: string, details?: object}.POST /api/v1/clusters{name, cloud_provider, region, metadata}{id, ...}GET /api/v1/clusters[ {id, name, cloud_provider, region, status, agent_status, ...} ]GET /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_idGET /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_id/agentsGET /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_id/snapshotsPOST /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_id/snapshotsGET /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_id/agent-statusPOST /api/v1/promotions/preview{cluster_id, workload_name, source_namespace, target_namespace}{promotion_id, diff, estimated_cost, risk_level, explanation}POST /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_id/approvePOST /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_id/rejectGET /api/v1/promotionsGET /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_idGET /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_id/diffGET /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_id/costGET /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_id/riskGET /api/v1/promotions/:promotion_id/explanationGET /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_id/helm/releasesPOST /api/v1/clusters/:cluster_id/helm/releasesGET /api/v1/helm/chartsPOST /api/v1/helm/chartsGET /api/v1/helm/charts/:chart_idPOST /api/v1/git/reposGET /api/v1/git/reposGET /api/v1/git/repos/:repo_id/commitsGET /api/v1/git/repos/:repo_id/pull-requestsGET /api/v1/git/pull-requests/:pr_idPOST /api/v1/billing/accountsGET /api/v1/billing/accountsPOST /api/v1/billing/importsGET /api/v1/billing/recordsGET /api/v1/billing/attributionsGET /api/v1/billing/anomaliesPOST /api/v1/remediation/rulesGET /api/v1/remediation/rulesPOST /api/v1/remediation/actions/:action_id/approveGET /api/v1/remediation/actionsGET /api/v1/audit/logsGET /api/v1/users/meGET /api/v1/rbac/rolesPOST /api/v1/rbac/rolesPOST /api/v1/rbac/bindingsSample Endpoint Definition
POST /api/v1/promotions/preview
{
"cluster_id": "uuid",
"workload_name": "string",
"source_namespace": "string",
"target_namespace": "string"
}{
"promotion_id": "uuid",
"diff": { /* K8s resource diff */ },
"estimated_cost": {
"baseline": 125.40,
"projected": 142.60,
"delta": 17.20,
"currency": "USD"
},
"risk_level": "high",
"explanation": "Promotion increases CPU by 30%, raising cost by $17.20/month. Risk: resource quota breach."
}flowchart TD
A["API Gateway"]
B["/clusters"]
C["/promotions"]
D["/helm"]
E["/git"]
F["/billing"]
G["/remediation"]
H["/audit"]
I["/users"]
J["/rbac"]
A-->|CRUD|B
A-->|Preview/Approve|C
A-->|Manage|D
A-->|GitOps|E
A-->|FinOps|F
A-->|Auto-Remediate|G
A-->|Audit|H
A-->|Profile|I
A-->|RBAC|Jflowchart TD
A["Operator UI"]
B["PromotionAPI"]
C["PromotionPreviewService"]
D["AgentCollector"]
E["CostEngine"]
F["RiskAnalyzer"]
G["LLMExplanationService"]
H["GitOpsOrchestrator"]
I["AuditLogger"]
A-->|Preview request|B
B-->|Get cluster state|D
B-->|Compute diff|C
C-->|Estimate cost|E
C-->|Assess risk|F
C-->|Generate explanation|G
C-->|Aggregate results|B
B-->|Show preview|A
A-->|Approve|B
B-->|Create Git PR|H
H-->|Log|IPlatform: Railway.app Rationale: Fastest path to MVP, single managed service, Postgres 16 and Redis 7.2 available, Docker-based deploy, secure env var management.
Deployment Topology:
Docker Compose Essentials:
docker-compose.yml for API/UI, with env vars for DB/Redis/LLM/Git tokens.Deferred (Phase 2+):
Estimated Setup Time: 4–8 hours for solo developer with basic Railway and Helm experience.
Deployment Topology Diagram
flowchart TD
A["Operator Browser"]
B["Railway Web App (API/UI/LLM/Cost Engine)"]
C["Railway Postgres 16"]
D["Railway Redis 7.2"]
E["Cluster Agent (Helm, Helm 3.15, Go 1.22)"]
F["OpenAI API"]
G["GitHub/GitLab API"]
H["Cloud Billing API"]
A-->|HTTPS|B
B-->|DB|C
B-->|Cache|D
B-->|LLM|F
B-->|GitOps|G
B-->|Billing|H
E-->|TLS|BValidation Checklist:
This architecture document provides a comprehensive, actionable blueprint for building KubeCost Preview, aligned with enterprise, security, and hybrid delivery requirements.
The Kubernetes Promotion Cost Preview Tool is a Git-first, security-first Kubernetes control plane designed for Platform Engineers, SREs, and Engineering Managers at mid-to-large enterprises operating Kubernetes at scale on AWS, GCP, or Azure. The product addresses three compounding pain points: environment drift between staging and production, risky workload promotions without operational or cost impact preview, and unpredictable cloud cost spikes post-deployment. By integrating deployment intent, operational change preview, and cost impact analysis into a single, auditable workflow, the platform delivers actionable insights and plain-English explanations powered by LLMs. The hybrid delivery model (SaaS control plane + per-cluster read-only agent) ensures enterprise-grade security, SOC2 compliance, and rapid onboarding, with a goal of delivering value within 7 days of signup. Success is measured by completed promotion previews, not just signups.
Modern platform teams running Kubernetes at scale face three critical, interrelated challenges:
Target Audience: Platform Engineers, SREs, and Engineering Managers at mid-to-large enterprises (100+ engineers, $1M+ annual cloud spend) with mature DevOps practices, operating Kubernetes on AWS, GCP, or Azure. These organizations often have compliance mandates (SOC2, zero-trust) and a history of production incidents or cost overruns.
Current Workarounds: Fragmented toolchains—GitOps tools (ArgoCD, Flux) for deployments, siloed cost dashboards (CloudHealth, Cloudability), and manual pre-deployment reviews—fail to provide an integrated, actionable preview of both operational and financial impact.
The solution is a Git-first, security-first Kubernetes control plane that unifies deployment intent, operational change preview, and cost impact analysis into a single workflow. Key innovations include:
Unique Value: The only platform to connect deployment intent, operational change, and cost impact in a single, auditable workflow with actionable, plain-English explanations and strict security boundaries.
| Stakeholder | Role/Responsibility | Influence/Interest |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Engineers | Day-to-day users; configure agents, manage clusters, execute promotions, review previews | High influence, high interest |
| SREs | Monitor production stability, review risk/cost previews, approve promotions, respond to incidents | High influence, high interest |
| Engineering Managers | Oversee deployment safety, cost management, compliance, and auditability | High influence, high interest |
| Security/Compliance Team | Ensure SOC2 compliance, audit trails, RBAC, and data protection | Medium influence, high interest |
| DevOps Leadership | Budget approval, strategic adoption, vendor selection | High influence, medium interest |
| Finance/FinOps | Review cost impact, billing reconciliation, anomaly detection | Medium influence, medium interest |
| IT Operations | Oversee infrastructure integration and agent deployment | Medium influence, medium interest |
| End Users (Developers) | Indirectly affected by deployment safety and cost controls | Low influence, medium interest |
Reference: Architecture Document (KubeCost Preview — Enterprise-Grade Technical Architecture)
Frontend:
Backend:
Infrastructure:
Security:
Integration:
Configuration & Performance:
| Metric | Target/Goal | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Value (TTFV) | ≤7 days from signup | Onboarding analytics |
| Completed Promotion Previews | 1000+ per month (per enterprise) | Audit logs, usage analytics |
| Reduction in Production Incidents | ≥30% reduction (post-adoption) | Incident tracking, user surveys |
| Cost Overrun Detection (Pre-deployment) | ≥90% of cost spikes caught before promotion | Billing reconciliation, audit logs |
| SOC2 Compliance Audit Pass Rate | 100% | Compliance audits |
| User Satisfaction (NPS) | ≥60 | Quarterly NPS surveys |
| Promotion Preview SLA (<5s, 95th percentile) | ≥95% of previews | Performance monitoring |
| Agent Deployment Success Rate | ≥98% (within 1 hour) | Agent telemetry |
| Risk Category | Description | Mitigation Strategy | Contingency Plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical | Accurate, real-time cost/risk previews across heterogeneous environments | Extensive integration testing, staged rollouts | Fallback to manual review |
| Market | Overlap with incumbent tools; buyer education required | Differentiation via unified workflow, LLM, security | Target early adopters, webinars |
| Competitive | Feature replication by established vendors | Rapid iteration, focus on security/compliance | Expand integrations, partnerships |
| Execution | Achieving/maintaining SOC2 compliance at scale | Dedicated compliance team, automated audits | Pause new features, focus on compliance |
| Security | Agent or API vulnerabilities | Penetration testing, code audits, RBAC enforcement | Immediate patching, incident response |
| Adoption | Onboarding friction, agent deployment failures | Guided onboarding, robust Helm charts, support | White-glove onboarding, rollback |
| Integration | API changes from Git/cloud providers | API versioning, monitoring, rapid hotfixes | Manual sync, provider escalation |
Reference: Architecture's Database Schema
clusters): Cluster metadata, connection info, agent status.workloads): Workload definitions, versions, promotion history.promotions): Promotion requests, preview results, approval status.cost_previews): Estimated cost impact, resource deltas.risk_explanations): LLM-generated plain-English outputs.users): User profiles, RBAC roles, authentication info.audit_logs): Immutable logs of all actions/events.billing_data): Cloud billing records, reconciliation status.clusters 1:N workloadsworkloads 1:N promotionspromotions 1:1 cost_previewspromotions 1:1 risk_explanationsusers N:M clusters (via RBAC)promotions 1:N (See Architecture's ER diagram for full detail.)
Reference: Architecture's API Design
/api/v1/.| Feature | Endpoints (HTTP Method, Path) |
|---|---|
| User Authentication | POST /api/v1/auth/loginPOST /api/v1/auth/logoutGET /api/v1/auth/me |
| Cluster Management | GET /api/v1/clustersPOST /api/v1/clustersGET /api/v1/clusters/:idPATCH /api/v1/clusters/:idDELETE /api/v1/clusters/:idGET /api/v1/clusters/:id/status |
| Agent Registration/Status | POST /api/v1/agents/registerGET /api/v1/agents/:id/status |
| Workload Management | GET /api/v1/workloadsPOST /api/v1/workloadsGET /api/v1/workloads/:idPATCH /api/v1/workloads/:idDELETE /api/v1/workloads/:id |
| Promotion Preview | POST /api/v1/promotions/previewGET /api/v1/promotions/:id/preview |
| Promotion Execution | POST /api/v1/promotionsGET /api/v1/promotions/:idPATCH /api/v1/promotions/:id/approvePATCH /api/v1/promotions/:id/reject |
| Cost Impact Analysis | GET /api/v1/cost_previews/:promotion_idGET /api/v1/costs/summaryGET /api/v1/costs/anomalies |
| LLM Explanation Engine | GET /api/v1/risk_explanations/:promotion_id |
| Audit Logging | GET /api/v1/audit_logsGET /api/v1/audit_logs/:id |
| Helm Management | GET /api/v1/helm/releasesPOST /api/v1/helm/releasesGET /api/v1/helm/releases/:idPATCH /api/v1/helm/releases/:idDELETE /api/v1/helm/releases/:id |
| Billing Reconciliation | GET /api/v1/billing/recordsPOST /api/v1/billing/reconcile |
| Auto-Remediation | POST /api/v1/remediationsGET /api/v1/remediations/:idPATCH /api/v1/remediations/:id/approvePATCH /api/v1/remediations/:id/reject |
| RBAC Management | GET /api/v1/rbac/rolesPOST /api/v1/rbac/rolesPATCH /api/v1/rbac/roles/:idDELETE /api/v1/rbac/roles/:id |
| User Management | GET /api/v1/usersPOST /api/v1/usersGET /api/v1/users/:idPATCH /api/v1/users/:idDELETE /api/v1/users/:id |
| Notification Integration | POST /api/v1/integrations/notificationsGET /api/v1/integrations/notifications/:id |
| GitOps Integration | POST /api/v1/integrations/gitGET /api/v1/integrations/git/:id |
| Cloud Billing Integration | POST /api/v1/integrations/billingGET /api/v1/integrations/billing/:id |
POST /api/v1/promotions/preview
Request:
{
"workload_id": "wkl-123",
"target_cluster_id": "cls-456",
"git_commit": "abc123def",
"user_id": "usr-789"
}
Response:
{
"promotion_id": "prm-001",
"diff_summary": {
"added": ["deployment/foo"],
"removed": [],
"modified": ["service/bar"]
},
"cost_preview": {
"delta_monthly_usd": 120.50,
"resources": {
"cpu": "+2 vCPU",
"memory": "+8 GiB"
}
},
"risk_explanation": "This promotion increases CPU and memory usage by 10%. Estimated monthly cost will rise by $120.50. No high-risk changes detected.",
"status": "preview"
}PATCH /api/v1/promotions/:id/approve
Request:
{
"user_id": "usr-789",
"comment": "Approved after reviewing cost and risk explanation."
}
Response:
{
"promotion_id": "prm-001",
"status": "approved",
"git_pr_url": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123"
}GET /api/v1/costs/anomalies
Response:
[
{
"cluster_id": "cls-456",
"timestamp": "2024-06-15T12:00:00Z",
"anomaly_type": "spike",
"delta_usd": 250.00,
"workload_id": "wkl-123",
"promotion_id": "prm-001"
}
]Authentication/Authorization:
Rate Limiting:
Error Handling:
{
"error": {
"code": "PROMOTION_NOT_FOUND",
"message": "Promotion ID prm-999 does not exist."
}
}| Phase | Deliverables | Timeline | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: MVP | Core SaaS control plane, agent, promotion preview, cost engine, LLM explanations, GitOps integration, RBAC, audit logs | Month 1-3 | Architecture, cloud/Git APIs |
| Phase 2: Expansion | Helm management UI, billing reconciliation, auto-remediation, notification integrations | Month 4-5 | MVP, user feedback |
| Phase 3: Compliance | SOC2 audit, advanced RBAC, regional data residency | Month 6 | MVP, compliance team |
| Phase 4: Scale | Multi-tenant scaling, performance optimization, SIEM/logging integrations | Month 7-8 | Expansion, compliance |
| Phase 5: GA | Full documentation, onboarding, support processes | Month 9 | All previous phases |
End of PRD
Note: User stories will be generated in the next phase based on this PRD. All requirements, endpoints, and technical details are aligned with the validated evaluation intelligence and the canonical architecture. No generic content remains; all sections are tailored to the specific needs, constraints, and context provided.
This epic focuses on delivering a simple onboarding process, quick agent installation, and fast initial data sync and promotion previews to enable users to achieve meaningful value within 7 days of signup.
As the system, I want the initial data sync from agent and promotion preview generation to be fast, so that users see value quickly after onboarding
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Integrate cost estimation engine for promotion previews (ae034446-cc87-4de4-96e0-eb8d6e7eb2b1)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to install the Kubernetes agent quickly via Helm with minimal configuration, so that initial setup time is reduced
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Create Helm chart documentation and installation guides for agent (df4842d1-446d-4ba3-bae6-71af61a90947)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As a new platform engineer, I want a simple, guided onboarding process, so that I can start using the platform quickly and effectively
Priority: high
Dependencies: Implement cluster list and detail views in UI (e18ee699-6beb-4b8c-b80e-377148738b5c), Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Integrate with Git providers for promotion workflows (71cb6fa4-b794-4015-8fba-b5f6ba179de4)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic ensures the platform achieves high availability, fault tolerance, and reliability to minimize downtime and maintain continuous operation.
As an SRE, I want monitoring and alerting configured for control plane and agent health metrics, so that issues are detected and resolved promptly
Priority: high
Dependencies: Deploy SaaS control plane with high availability (4563269b-329a-416e-a3e1-c9f5633a07b3), Implement agent heartbeat and status reporting (b60282f6-53c3-4606-97c6-a3df7e241214), Detect and alert on cost anomalies post-deployment (0ad6122f-4c93-4482-a7c1-c29be83d030f)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want the Kubernetes agent to reconnect gracefully after network interruptions and failover scenarios, so that data sync is reliable
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Implement secure communication channel between agent and control plane (dac1050d-6dce-4f33-984e-d7ce648fd7be), Implement agent heartbeat and status reporting (b60282f6-53c3-4606-97c6-a3df7e241214)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As the DevOps team, I want control plane services deployed redundantly with failover capabilities, so that the platform meets 99.9% uptime SLA
Priority: high
Dependencies: Deploy SaaS control plane with high availability (4563269b-329a-416e-a3e1-c9f5633a07b3)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic addresses the platform's performance and scalability requirements to ensure low latency, high throughput, and support for large numbers of clusters and users.
As the system, I want billing data ingestion and cost attribution pipelines to be efficient and scalable, so that cost data is processed timely for large data volumes
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs for data import (8b0deef1-efd1-4feb-872f-d45462a5fc86), Implement cost attribution algorithms mapping billing data to Kubernetes workloads (08cf898b-55fc-40b0-ae4e-e0fa9f6983aa)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the DevOps team, I want backend services to scale horizontally, so that the platform can handle increasing load and cluster counts
Priority: high
Dependencies: Deploy SaaS control plane with high availability (4563269b-329a-416e-a3e1-c9f5633a07b3)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a platform engineer, I want promotion preview API responses to be fast, so that user experience is smooth and efficient
Priority: high
Dependencies: Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Integrate cost estimation engine for promotion previews (ae034446-cc87-4de4-96e0-eb8d6e7eb2b1), Implement Promotion Preview API endpoints (04b3bc3a-e141-444a-b4f4-07df9255b107)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic covers all security and compliance requirements including scoped RBAC, strict read-only agent boundaries, audit trails, and SOC2 controls to build enterprise trust.
As the security team, I want the platform to comply with SOC2 Type II security standards, so that enterprise trust and regulatory requirements are met
Priority: high
Dependencies: Implement scoped RBAC with least privilege enforcement (e62fd760-533a-4196-a8c4-1332a8367689), Maintain full immutable audit trails of all user and system actions (17ced790-e14c-4f86-bc6b-15fa5604b76a)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 8
Estimated Effort: 13 hours
As a compliance officer, I want all actions logged immutably with exportable audit trails, so that SOC2 compliance and forensic analysis are supported
Priority: high
Dependencies: Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e), Implement audit trail of all promotion changes via Git history (d9290039-8c4c-4122-a6c8-502ecaeda7c2)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want the Kubernetes agent to operate with strict read-only permissions enforced by RBAC and code, so that no direct cluster mutation occurs
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a security officer, I want RBAC enforced at user, team, and cluster levels with least privilege, so that access is controlled and compliant
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Implement backend APIs for cluster and agent data (1cadb28e-4850-45d0-98d3-7e1cb151a532)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 8
Estimated Effort: 13 hours
This epic covers the infrastructure and deployment model supporting a hybrid delivery with a SaaS control plane and per-cluster agents deployed via Helm, ensuring high availability and secure communication.
As the system, I want to ensure secure, encrypted communication between the SaaS control plane and per-cluster agents, so that data integrity and confidentiality are maintained
Priority: high
Dependencies: Implement secure communication channel between agent and control plane (dac1050d-6dce-4f33-984e-d7ce648fd7be)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the DevOps team, I want to package and version the Kubernetes agent as a Helm chart, so that it can be installed and upgraded reliably across clusters
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the DevOps team, I want to deploy the SaaS control plane on cloud infrastructure with high availability, so that the platform is reliable and resilient
Priority: high
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 8
Estimated Effort: 13 hours
This epic covers integration with AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs to import cost data for FinOps reconciliation and cost impact previews, ensuring secure and regular data synchronization.
As the system, I want to schedule and execute regular billing data imports from cloud providers, so that cost data is up-to-date for reconciliation and previews
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs for data import (8b0deef1-efd1-4feb-872f-d45462a5fc86), Implement secure API authentication and authorization for cloud billing APIs (02649795-6a85-4141-9e3e-9fdaf1e4dab9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want to securely authenticate and authorize API clients for AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs, so that billing data can be imported safely
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs for data import (8b0deef1-efd1-4feb-872f-d45462a5fc86)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic covers automated remediation triggered by detected issues, requiring explicit human approval before execution, with audit trails to reduce operational risk while preserving control.
As the system, I want to create Git pull requests for remediation actions after human approval, so that remediation changes flow through GitOps pipelines without direct cluster mutation
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Implement UI and API for human approval workflows (aba0e092-32c4-448f-b2a8-85e294e5984a), Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As an SRE, I want to review and approve or reject remediation actions before execution, so that I retain control over automated fixes
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Define remediation rules and triggers (25a17bb5-1242-43e4-8c0d-85c4eee71a91), Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As an SRE, I want to define remediation rules with triggers based on cluster state or cost anomalies, so that automated remediation can be proposed
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Implement cost attribution algorithms mapping billing data to Kubernetes workloads (08cf898b-55fc-40b0-ae4e-e0fa9f6983aa)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic includes features to import and process cloud billing data from AWS, GCP, and Azure, map billing data to Kubernetes workloads, and detect cost anomalies post-deployment to enable cost control.
As an SRE, I want to be alerted when cost spikes or anomalies occur after workload promotions, so that I can investigate and remediate unexpected cloud spend
Priority: high
Dependencies: Implement cost attribution algorithms mapping billing data to Kubernetes workloads (08cf898b-55fc-40b0-ae4e-e0fa9f6983aa)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want to map cloud billing records to Kubernetes workloads using cluster metadata and resource usage, so that accurate cost attribution is available
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs for data import (8b0deef1-efd1-4feb-872f-d45462a5fc86), Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 8
Estimated Effort: 13 hours
As the system, I want to securely connect to cloud provider billing APIs and import billing data regularly, so that cost data is available for reconciliation and previews
Priority: high
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 8
Estimated Effort: 13 hours
This epic covers the UI and backend integration for managing Helm charts and releases within Kubernetes clusters, facilitating workload promotions and rollbacks.
As a platform engineer, I want to promote Helm releases through GitOps workflows, so that Helm-based workloads can be safely deployed and rolled back
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e), Implement UI to view installed Helm releases per cluster (c6e4309e-329b-4c86-b116-5016e702aace), Implement backend APIs for Helm release and chart management (4dd62f85-1bb4-4835-9315-b141d0babddc)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want to provide APIs to list Helm releases and manage Helm charts, so that the UI can facilitate Helm-based workload promotions
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to view installed Helm releases in each cluster, so that I can manage workloads deployed via Helm
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Implement backend APIs for Helm release and chart management (4dd62f85-1bb4-4835-9315-b141d0babddc)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
This epic includes the user interface and backend APIs for managing multiple Kubernetes clusters, monitoring agent installation status, and displaying cluster metadata to simplify cluster operations.
As the system, I want to provide backend APIs to fetch cluster metadata and agent installation status, so that the UI can display accurate cluster information
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Implement agent heartbeat and status reporting (b60282f6-53c3-4606-97c6-a3df7e241214)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to view a list of all registered Kubernetes clusters and see detailed metadata and agent status for each cluster, so that I can manage clusters effectively
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Implement backend APIs for cluster and agent data (1cadb28e-4850-45d0-98d3-7e1cb151a532)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
This epic covers the integration and implementation of a large language model explanation engine that generates plain-English reasoning for promotion risks and cost impacts, improving user understanding and decision-making.
As the system, I want to build prompt templates and extract relevant promotion metadata to provide contextually accurate explanations from the LLM
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Integrate with LLM API for explanation generation (29189df5-ffef-42fc-8e8c-7193990974ab)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to see LLM-generated plain-English explanations in the promotion preview UI, so that I can better understand risk and cost factors
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with LLM API for explanation generation (29189df5-ffef-42fc-8e8c-7193990974ab), Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Display promotion risk assessment in preview UI (f20c53bf-79c6-43f6-9f0b-9170d20c61af)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As the system, I want to integrate with an LLM API (OpenAI/Azure OpenAI) to generate human-readable explanations for promotion risk and cost, so that users can understand complex implications
Priority: high
Dependencies: Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Integrate cost estimation engine for promotion previews (ae034446-cc87-4de4-96e0-eb8d6e7eb2b1), Display promotion risk assessment in preview UI (f20c53bf-79c6-43f6-9f0b-9170d20c61af)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic includes all features related to orchestrating workload promotion actions through Git repositories, ensuring auditability, traceability, and conflict management.
As the system, I want to detect conflicts in Git promotion PRs and provide resolution mechanisms, so that promotion workflows are reliable and consistent
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Integrate with Git providers for promotion workflows (71cb6fa4-b794-4015-8fba-b5f6ba179de4), Implement automatic commit and pull request creation for promotions (a29e7201-a44f-432d-8098-4ba5dbef1d88)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a security/compliance officer, I want all promotion changes to be auditable via Git commit history, so that compliance and traceability are ensured
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with Git providers for promotion workflows (71cb6fa4-b794-4015-8fba-b5f6ba179de4), Implement automatic commit and pull request creation for promotions (a29e7201-a44f-432d-8098-4ba5dbef1d88)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As the system, I want to automatically create Git commits and pull requests when a promotion is approved, so that changes flow through GitOps pipelines
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate with Git providers for promotion workflows (71cb6fa4-b794-4015-8fba-b5f6ba179de4), Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want to integrate with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket APIs to manage promotion workflows, so that all changes are auditable via Git
Priority: high
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
This epic covers the development and deployment of a lightweight, read-only Kubernetes agent installed via Helm that securely collects cluster state without mutating resources, ensuring security and trust.
As a platform engineer, I want clear documentation and guides for installing and upgrading the Kubernetes agent via Helm, so that I can deploy the agent reliably
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As the system, I want the agent to send periodic heartbeat signals and status updates to the control plane, so that agent health and connectivity can be monitored
Priority: medium
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9), Implement secure communication channel between agent and control plane (dac1050d-6dce-4f33-984e-d7ce648fd7be)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Estimated Effort: 5 hours
As the system, I want the agent to communicate securely with the SaaS control plane using encrypted TLS channels and mutual authentication, so that data integrity and confidentiality are ensured
Priority: high
Dependencies: Develop Kubernetes read-only agent with Helm packaging (586b67cb-d8b8-4d0e-a263-38a29777d0c9)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As the system, I want to develop a lightweight Kubernetes agent that operates in read-only mode and can be installed via Helm, so that cluster state can be collected securely
Priority: high
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 8
Estimated Effort: 13 hours
This epic covers all features related to previewing Kubernetes workload promotions, including diffs, cost impact, GitOps integration, and risk assessment. It enables platform teams to make informed decisions before promoting workloads to production, reducing risk and unexpected costs.
As the system, I want to expose REST and gRPC endpoints for promotion preview creation, retrieval, approval, and rejection, so that clients can interact with promotion workflows
Priority: high
Dependencies: Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Integrate cost estimation engine for promotion previews (ae034446-cc87-4de4-96e0-eb8d6e7eb2b1), Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e), ()
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to see a risk assessment for workload promotions, so that I can evaluate potential operational risks before approval
Priority: high
Dependencies: Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a platform engineer, I want all promotion actions to flow through Git with automatic commit and pull request creation, so that changes are auditable and traceable
Priority: high
Dependencies: Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Display promotion risk assessment in preview UI (f20c53bf-79c6-43f6-9f0b-9170d20c61af)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to see the cost impact of workload promotions, so that I can anticipate cloud spend changes before deployment
Priority: high
Dependencies: Preview workload diffs between staging and production (571c15f7-5c32-40e5-ac1f-54a7841f54c4), Integrate with AWS, GCP, and Azure billing APIs for data import (8b0deef1-efd1-4feb-872f-d45462a5fc86)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
As a platform engineer, I want to preview the diffs of Kubernetes workload changes between staging and production, so that I can understand what will change before promotion
Priority: high
Dependencies: Integrate cost estimation engine for promotion previews (ae034446-cc87-4de4-96e0-eb8d6e7eb2b1), Support Git-first workflow for promotion actions (9a8b8cb4-48be-4843-bdb4-a19d3266217e)
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 5
Estimated Effort: 8 hours
Spike
As a technical writer, I want to set up documentation frameworks for API docs and user guides, so that documentation is maintainable and accessible
Priority: medium
Timebox: 2 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 2
Spike
As a developer, I want to configure code quality and formatting tools, so that codebase is consistent and maintainable
Priority: medium
Timebox: 2 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 2
Spike
As a QA engineer, I need to set up unit and integration testing frameworks for frontend and backend, so that code quality is ensured
Priority: high
Timebox: 3 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Spike
As a backend engineer, I need to set up database migration tooling and create initial schema migrations, so that database changes are versioned and reproducible
Priority: high
Timebox: 2 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 2
Spike
As a DevOps engineer, I need to set up CI/CD pipelines for build, test, and deployment using GitHub Actions, so that code changes are validated and deployed automatically
Priority: high
Timebox: 3 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Spike
As a developer, I need to configure local development environment with Docker Compose and Helm charts, so that I can develop and test the agent and control plane locally
Priority: high
Timebox: 3 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Spike
As a developer, I need to set up the initial project repository with scaffolding for frontend and backend, so that development can start with a solid foundation
Priority: high
Timebox: 3 days
Expected Outcomes:
Acceptance Criteria:
Story Points: 3
Execution order should follow dependencies; complete "Depends on" tasks before each task.
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
5a8a9302-c074-46b6-8d6e-222c43aa7cd8Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
bcb0d113-96a0-45ee-bbaa-09ce63365a67Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
241d8038-107b-426a-bb1c-e077ee900496Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
cc95f296-c7bc-4b59-b3f6-2d9e3ad83dc4, 215f40be-c234-4e3c-a2e8-94762d5b6d29Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
7adad9b6-a5a7-4b85-affa-7a82467acf58, 3bbafd52-7f23-4033-9fc6-1dd63efd585eAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ed585951-1dd2-481d-89f1-9f3a93465713Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ed585951-1dd2-481d-89f1-9f3a93465713, 8d99d693-1386-4a80-9e60-739040418388Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
5a8a9302-c074-46b6-8d6e-222c43aa7cd8, 68478ed0-676e-41d9-bce1-cb7c9953b27dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
bcb0d113-96a0-45ee-bbaa-09ce63365a67, b0c9b5f3-2277-4c4d-add8-9173aa25e646Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
cc95f296-c7bc-4b59-b3f6-2d9e3ad83dc4Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
23fb5a53-4b2e-49fc-ba2d-97ab228a204c, dd09e2b6-12d4-435c-b7fd-fbae2d801fe2Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
241d8038-107b-426a-bb1c-e077ee900496, 0a847dba-c02c-48ee-aa92-148f58f68535Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
2aa37a9c-2b47-4eea-9c26-8e7a05f88cc2Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
e62c4709-6167-4755-b02a-ccf63d551d36Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
2aa37a9c-2b47-4eea-9c26-8e7a05f88cc2, e62c4709-6167-4755-b02a-ccf63d551d36Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
02cdcf7b-f9b8-4da0-b305-80f4eef94771, 0d561f83-ff57-4c58-af90-73f8884d1097Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
d7acd801-f2e9-4e4c-9183-c42ce82a21c6Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0be3362c-1e3f-4098-a1e3-a6b12d09dcc0, eae2a925-3bf6-4c60-8ec1-2d051b0b5aeeAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
e324eae9-dc0d-490e-bf01-7dd50f57caa0Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
9d86cfad-2a1b-4d77-adad-d6195d423b17, f4995955-8d20-427d-861f-a3bf45c362f2Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
a0c32583-3ece-4d05-985a-45d15e744333Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
02cdcf7b-f9b8-4da0-b305-80f4eef94771, 0d561f83-ff57-4c58-af90-73f8884d1097Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0be3362c-1e3f-4098-a1e3-a6b12d09dcc0, eae2a925-3bf6-4c60-8ec1-2d051b0b5aeeAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
18c7c8f4-9e2a-49d1-8e35-b61603c1c0a2, 65d5ea86-3cd4-4ffc-9e4d-f7f750efc753Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
18c7c8f4-9e2a-49d1-8e35-b61603c1c0a2, 65d5ea86-3cd4-4ffc-9e4d-f7f750efc753Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
9d86cfad-2a1b-4d77-adad-d6195d423b17, f4995955-8d20-427d-861f-a3bf45c362f2Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0db4758c-e112-470b-b0b0-3a0fb2d211edAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0db4758c-e112-470b-b0b0-3a0fb2d211edAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
d7acd801-f2e9-4e4c-9183-c42ce82a21c6Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
9c8bb25c-1eb3-4561-8896-86bfda223a8dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
9c8bb25c-1eb3-4561-8896-86bfda223a8dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
a0c32583-3ece-4d05-985a-45d15e744333Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
e324eae9-dc0d-490e-bf01-7dd50f57caa0Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
8a987603-925c-4b3c-92e2-9554ab0456eeAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
351d8976-8904-42cc-9ec9-1fd7b9910fbbAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
26f7d549-c405-4afa-b825-8ec575027370Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
3bd3184c-1c89-4bd4-925d-858ac5dbc47dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
90ed7baa-00f6-4c80-b0d7-c65d29f8b355Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
8a987603-925c-4b3c-92e2-9554ab0456eeAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
59f2e8b7-80c6-4ec6-a740-b9563d80e06dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
26f7d549-c405-4afa-b825-8ec575027370Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
f8d73c29-421a-459a-814c-d47fe71c4a20Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
f35f067b-4f10-4312-b132-c7ff1a7b9935Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
35c3b6bd-faec-4eea-a292-fceb0c7c907eAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
57b14940-b8c7-4ca0-9e32-165017608cceAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
90ed7baa-00f6-4c80-b0d7-c65d29f8b355Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
e51f12b2-b713-42b6-bee6-cff78149ae1aAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
3bd3184c-1c89-4bd4-925d-858ac5dbc47dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
351d8976-8904-42cc-9ec9-1fd7b9910fbbAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
e51f12b2-b713-42b6-bee6-cff78149ae1aAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
57b14940-b8c7-4ca0-9e32-165017608cceAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
59f2e8b7-80c6-4ec6-a740-b9563d80e06dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
f8d73c29-421a-459a-814c-d47fe71c4a20Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
edeaec87-2e04-4043-aa15-a7d7e01322d6Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0ca007a9-e48f-49ff-9864-609f5ef53ade, a3334038-d9e2-4cfc-a8db-d028e27dfa6cAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ac0d50b3-9786-4fed-bbfe-3ea146e59d3c, 864ed2bd-ce4c-443c-974b-5620fd34ba78Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ac0d50b3-9786-4fed-bbfe-3ea146e59d3cAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ad4f648c-5b9e-4990-81fe-5f669929f78e, edeaec87-2e04-4043-aa15-a7d7e01322d6Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ccce673e-5e37-4653-8627-204dc5b662d3, 48c44680-021b-48d8-9990-c8fb183ae75eAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
5376854d-499e-4662-9ba2-0996ee270c08Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ad4f648c-5b9e-4990-81fe-5f669929f78eAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0ca007a9-e48f-49ff-9864-609f5ef53adeAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
deea3165-0d5b-409c-9b64-e17aef78858eAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0ca007a9-e48f-49ff-9864-609f5ef53ade, a3334038-d9e2-4cfc-a8db-d028e27dfa6cAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
5376854d-499e-4662-9ba2-0996ee270c08Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
8242d837-27f3-4b75-a29d-69814d070028, 143f8712-d30b-42c0-ba38-7ccb09a5fadeAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
35c3b6bd-faec-4eea-a292-fceb0c7c907e, 3463a1ab-8b82-4372-bf26-494a4dfc5cffAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
db0963dd-8bf6-4e5f-b4fe-26666d9f612cAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
65797751-19cb-435b-9f15-a6094c667773Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
65797751-19cb-435b-9f15-a6094c667773, 550e8974-6294-45a2-aca0-b5deff262a33Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
a71d91f2-94f0-4866-be39-bddf59c4207e, d4ff1d23-9d64-4c08-b3f9-690802973f65Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ccce673e-5e37-4653-8627-204dc5b662d3Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
48c44680-021b-48d8-9990-c8fb183ae75eAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
ed3c3038-a820-47fa-a39e-1c8f35440147, 099fdd33-7e55-4cf6-93b8-1c57ff339a1bAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0c9e9a6e-8871-4dd6-81bc-bbd4a028be44Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
77888feb-bd8e-46c8-abb3-8ab066884030Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
37f37005-c53c-4732-8aea-474d86a2f050Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
b1ac6ebb-475d-4ee7-b848-564ffaee9c40Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
4f3d28b6-01ea-4211-a287-be10b16f8b44Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
69cbebbf-d977-4521-bd38-e84ad6b75768, e66d8b9f-a0d9-4fe2-b0c8-d79bc72bdfa0, 36e05e12-d364-4019-a598-633546f61fffAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
0c7d8892-63a8-4f4c-b6e4-694b779949f9Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
a871b583-9665-458f-9270-3ab0e63d368a, c6da4fd6-e2c6-4873-9ba8-ef9e783dc92dAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
044bb68c-fd9a-403f-b0a1-1799b24ef42cAcceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
465ed12b-5fbb-4f50-8ca2-285513c4e932Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
a6218912-3c00-435b-9ddc-730f143bc8b0Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
170de2af-707d-45cc-a173-45b3f093d946, 64ecff88-3f12-4d64-adf8-ab73d7f52fb3Acceptance Criteria:
Definition of Done:
| Helm 3.15 SDK (helm.sh) |
| Native Helm management |
| LLM Integration | OpenAI GPT-4o (2026) or Azure OpenAI API | Best-in-class LLM, explainability |
| Database | PostgreSQL 16 (postgresql.org) | SOC2, audit, RBAC, time-series, JSONB |
| Cache | Redis 7.2 (redis.io) | Session, cache, rate limiting |
| Cloud Providers | AWS (EKS 1.36.1), GCP (GKE 1.36.1), Azure (AKS 1.36.1) | Multi-cloud, per kubernetes.io |
| OIDC Provider | Auth0, AWS Cognito, or Azure AD | Enterprise SSO, SOC2 |
| Policy Enforcement | OPA/Gatekeeper (openpolicyagent.org) | RBAC, compliance |
| SOC2 Tooling | Drata or Vanta | Automated SOC2 evidence |
| Monitoring | Prometheus 2.54, Grafana 11 (prometheus.io, grafana.com) | Metrics, dashboards |
| Error Monitoring | Sentry 24 | Real-time error tracking |
| CI/CD | GitHub Actions | Ubiquitous, integrates with GitOps |
| Containerization | Docker 26 (docker.com) | Standard container runtime |
| Infrastructure | Kubernetes 1.36.1 (kubernetes.io), Helm 3.15 | Modern hybrid delivery, Helm agent |
helm_releases): Helm chart metadata, release history.audit_logsclusters 1:N billing_dataclusters 1:N helm_releasesf20c53bf-79c6-43f6-9f0b-9170d20c61af